Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology

1.0k papers and 9.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology in the last decades have received a total of 9.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology usually cover Dermatology (322 papers), Ophthalmology (291 papers) and Molecular Biology (159 papers) specifically the topics of Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (138 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (133 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (113 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology are Howard I. Maibach, Howard I. Maïbach, Miranda A. Farage, David A. Basketter, David A. Basketter, Kenneth W. Miller, Malcolm Xing, Peter Elsner, Wen Zhong and Ayşe Serap Karadağ.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology.

Countries where authors publish in Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025