James C. VanderKam

340 total papers · 3.1k total citations
83 papers, 468 citations indexed

About

James C. VanderKam is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, James C. VanderKam has authored 83 papers receiving a total of 468 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 66 papers in Religious studies, 54 papers in Archeology and 21 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in James C. VanderKam's work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (66 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (47 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (21 papers). James C. VanderKam is often cited by papers focused on Biblical Studies and Interpretation (66 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (47 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (21 papers). James C. VanderKam collaborates with scholars based in United States, Brazil and United Kingdom. James C. VanderKam's co-authors include George W. E. Nickelsburg, Martha Himmelfarb, John J. Collins, John G. Gammie, Carey A. Moore, Peter W. Flint, Lawrence H. Schiffman, J. A. Emerton, Matthew Black and Klaus Baltzer and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Journal of Biblical Literature.

In The Last Decade

James C. VanderKam

70 papers receiving 316 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
James C. VanderKam	392	310	215	33	30	83	468
F. F. Bruce	407 1.0×	166 0.5×	234 1.1×	29 0.9×	31 1.0×	89	497
Emanuel Tov	342 0.9×	286 0.9×	242 1.1×	27 0.8×	23 0.8×	92	522
Karel van der Toorn	247 0.6×	263 0.8×	125 0.6×	34 1.0×	27 0.9×	57	430
Philip F. Esler	350 0.9×	149 0.5×	288 1.3×	21 0.6×	34 1.1×	58	464
Helmut Koester	346 0.9×	171 0.6×	237 1.1×	28 0.8×	46 1.5×	40	433
Marvin H. Pope	205 0.5×	177 0.6×	142 0.7×	37 1.1×	42 1.4×	51	406
Othmar Keel	212 0.5×	216 0.7×	84 0.4×	30 0.9×	23 0.8×	72	405
Jacob Milgrom	401 1.0×	285 0.9×	193 0.9×	32 1.0×	49 1.6×	58	492
Stefan C. Reif	282 0.7×	196 0.6×	218 1.0×	58 1.8×	73 2.4×	86	537
Carol Meyers	339 0.9×	222 0.7×	179 0.8×	34 1.0×	37 1.2×	53	509

Countries citing papers authored by James C. VanderKam

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James C. VanderKam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. VanderKam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. VanderKam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James C. VanderKam

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. VanderKam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. VanderKam. The network helps show where James C. VanderKam may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James C. VanderKam

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James C. VanderKam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James C. VanderKam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James C. VanderKam. James C. VanderKam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact