Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Intrinsic and extrinsic factors in skin ageing: a review
2008622 citationsMiranda A. Farage, Kenneth W. Miller et al.profile →
Characteristics of the Aging Skin
2013349 citationsMiranda A. Farage, Kenneth W. Miller et al.Advances in Wound Careprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth W. Miller
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth W. Miller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth W. Miller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth W. Miller more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth W. Miller
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth W. Miller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth W. Miller. The network helps show where Kenneth W. Miller may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kenneth W. Miller
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kenneth W. Miller.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kenneth W. Miller based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kenneth W. Miller. Kenneth W. Miller is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Farage, Miranda A., Kenneth W. Miller, Peter Elsner, & Howard I. Maïbach. (2013). Characteristics of the Aging Skin. Advances in Wound Care. 2(1). 5–10.349 indexed citations breakdown →
Miller, Kenneth W. & David M. Davison. (2006). What Makes a Secondary School Science and/or Mathematics Teacher "Highly Qualified?".. Science educator. 15(1). 56–59.7 indexed citations
Triggle, David J. & Kenneth W. Miller. (2002). Doctoral Education: Another Tragedy of the Commons?. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 66(3).9 indexed citations
9.
Miller, Kenneth W. & David M. Davison. (2001). A Cultural and Linguistic Approach to Teaching Science and Mathematics to Native American Students.. Science educator. 10(1). 38–42.1 indexed citations
Miller, Kenneth W. & David M. Davison. (1999). Paradigms and Praxis: The Role of Science and Mathematics Integration.. Science educator. 8(1). 25–29.2 indexed citations
Miller, Kenneth W. & David M. Davison. (1998). Is Thematic Integration the Best Way To Reform Science and Mathematics Education. Science educator. 7(1). 7–12.1 indexed citations
14.
Miller, Kenneth W.. (1997). Issues in Integrating Mathematics and Science.. Science educator. 6(1). 16–21.9 indexed citations
15.
Miller, Kenneth W.. (1996). Paradigmatic School Philosophies as Barriers To School Reform.. Science educator. 5(1). 1–6.1 indexed citations
Kim, Youngki, Kenneth W. Miller, & Alfred F. Michael. (1977). Breakdown products of C3 and factor B in hemolytic-uremic syndrome.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 89(4). 845–50.52 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.