Current Addiction Reports

584 papers and 11.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 584 papers published in Current Addiction Reports in the last decades have received a total of 11.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Addiction Reports usually cover Clinical Psychology (252 papers), Epidemiology (126 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (121 papers) specifically the topics of Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (113 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (89 papers) and Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (81 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Addiction Reports are Cecilie Schou Andreassen, Mark D. Griffiths, Joël Billieux, Olatz López-Fernández, Pierre Maurage, Daria J. Kuss, Sally Gainsbury, Adrian Meule, Ashley N. Gearhardt and Matthias Brand.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Addiction Reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Addiction Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Addiction Reports.

Countries where authors publish in Current Addiction Reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Addiction Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Addiction Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Addiction Reports more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025