Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The relationship between addictive use of social media and video games and symptoms of psychiatric disorders: A large-scale cross-sectional study.
20161.3k citationsCecilie Schou Andreassen, Joël Billieux et al.Psychology of Addictive Behaviorsprofile →
Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale
20121.3k citationsCecilie Schou Andreassen, Torbjørn Torsheim et al.Psychological Reportsprofile →
The relationship between addictive use of social media, narcissism, and self-esteem: Findings from a large national survey
2016893 citationsCecilie Schou Andreassen, Ståle Pallesen et al.Addictive Behaviorsprofile →
Online Social Network Site Addiction: A Comprehensive Review
Countries citing papers authored by Cecilie Schou Andreassen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Cecilie Schou Andreassen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cecilie Schou Andreassen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cecilie Schou Andreassen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cecilie Schou Andreassen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cecilie Schou Andreassen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cecilie Schou Andreassen. The network helps show where Cecilie Schou Andreassen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cecilie Schou Andreassen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cecilie Schou Andreassen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cecilie Schou Andreassen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Cecilie Schou Andreassen. Cecilie Schou Andreassen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Andreassen, Cecilie Schou, Joël Billieux, Mark D. Griffiths, et al.. (2017). Adicción a internet, redes sociales y videojuegos: La relación entre el uso adictivo de las redes sociales y los video juegos y síntomas de trastornos psiquiátricos: un estudio transversal a gran escala. 2–2.2 indexed citations
Andreassen, Cecilie Schou, Joël Billieux, Mark D. Griffiths, et al.. (2016). The relationship between addictive use of social media and video games and symptoms of psychiatric disorders: A large-scale cross-sectional study.. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 30(2). 252–262.1316 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Salem, Ashraf Atta M. S., et al.. (2016). A Psychometric Evaluation of Bergen Facebook Addiction Scale (BFAS) of University Students. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences. 6(5). 199–205.22 indexed citations
Andreassen, Cecilie Schou, Torbjørn Torsheim, Geir Scott Brunborg, & Ståle Pallesen. (2012). Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale. Psychological Reports. 110(2). 501–517.1276 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.