JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques

410 papers and 2.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 410 papers published in JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques in the last decades have received a total of 2.3k indexed citations. Papers published in JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques usually cover Surgery (376 papers), Epidemiology (122 papers) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (88 papers) specifically the topics of Shoulder Injury and Treatment (118 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (117 papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (72 papers). The most active scholars publishing in JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques are S. Robert Rozbruch, Isador H. Lieberman, Alan Getgood, Eric R. Wagner, Austin T. Fragomen, Paul D. Sponseller, J. M. Hoogendoorn, Klaus A. Siebenrock, Moritz Tannast and Joaquín Sánchez‐Sotelo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques.

Countries where authors publish in JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025