Cognition Technology & Work

913 papers and 14.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 913 papers published in Cognition Technology & Work in the last decades have received a total of 14.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Cognition Technology & Work usually cover Social Psychology (462 papers), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (182 papers) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (119 papers) specifically the topics of Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (390 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (182 papers) and Risk and Safety Analysis (117 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cognition Technology & Work are Sidney Dekker, David D. Woods, Erik Hollnagel, Frédéric Vanderhaegen, Janet C. Read, David A. Abbink, Robert L. Wears, Joost de Winter, Erwin R. Boer and Richard I. Cook.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cognition Technology & Work

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cognition Technology & Work. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cognition Technology & Work.

Countries where authors publish in Cognition Technology & Work

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cognition Technology & Work. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cognition Technology & Work with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cognition Technology & Work more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025