Cryptogamie Bryologie

463 papers and 2.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 463 papers published in Cryptogamie Bryologie in the last decades have received a total of 2.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Cryptogamie Bryologie usually cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (434 papers), Plant Science (386 papers) and Ecology (31 papers) specifically the topics of Bryophyte Studies and Records (415 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (360 papers) and Lichen and fungal ecology (324 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cryptogamie Bryologie are S. Robbert Gradstein, Ryszard Ochyra, Jochen Heinrichs, Halina Bednarek-Ochyra, Gaik Ee Lee, Alfons Schäfer‐Verwimp, Harald Kürschner, Rui‐Liang Zhu, Cecı́lia Sérgio and Jacques Bardat.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cryptogamie Bryologie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cryptogamie Bryologie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cryptogamie Bryologie.

Countries where authors publish in Cryptogamie Bryologie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cryptogamie Bryologie. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cryptogamie Bryologie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cryptogamie Bryologie more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025