Congestive Heart Failure

751 papers and 12.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 751 papers published in Congestive Heart Failure in the last decades have received a total of 12.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Congestive Heart Failure usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (597 papers), Surgery (152 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (137 papers) specifically the topics of Heart Failure Treatment and Management (353 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (200 papers) and Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (155 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Congestive Heart Failure are Domenic A. Sica, Dan C. Sorescu, Kathy K. Griendling, William T. Abraham, Nils G. Morgenthaler, Alan S. Maisel, Clyde W. Yancy, David Tepper, Marc A. Silver and Neil A. Smart.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Congestive Heart Failure

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Congestive Heart Failure. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Congestive Heart Failure.

Countries where authors publish in Congestive Heart Failure

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Congestive Heart Failure. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Congestive Heart Failure with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Congestive Heart Failure more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025