Current Heart Failure Reports

831 papers and 13.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 831 papers published in Current Heart Failure Reports in the last decades have received a total of 13.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Heart Failure Reports usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (638 papers), Surgery (162 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (125 papers) specifically the topics of Heart Failure Treatment and Management (334 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (247 papers) and Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (139 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Heart Failure Reports are Carsten Tschöpe, Sophie Van Linthout, W.H. Wilson Tang, Philip B. Adamson, Rudolf A. de Boer, Sanjiv J. Shah, Véronique L. Roger, Shannon M. Dunlay, P. Christian Schulze and Konstantinos Drosatos.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Heart Failure Reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Heart Failure Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Heart Failure Reports.

Countries where authors publish in Current Heart Failure Reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Heart Failure Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Heart Failure Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Heart Failure Reports more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025