Faraday Discussions

4.0k papers and 119.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.0k papers published in Faraday Discussions in the last decades have received a total of 119.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Faraday Discussions usually cover Materials Chemistry (1.3k papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.2k papers) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (639 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (530 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (518 papers) and Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (265 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Faraday Discussions are Zhong Lin Wang, John C. Tully, Michael J. Natan, Richard Jones, Paul W. Ayers, Jeremy N. Harvey, William H. Miller, Joseph L. Keddie, Masatake Haruta and Miroslav Kohout.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Faraday Discussions

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Faraday Discussions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Faraday Discussions.

Countries where authors publish in Faraday Discussions

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Faraday Discussions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Faraday Discussions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Faraday Discussions more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025