Comparative Strategy

829 papers and 2.4k indexed citations

About

The 829 papers published in Comparative Strategy in the last decades have received a total of 2.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Comparative Strategy usually cover Political Science and International Relations (580 papers), Sociology and Political Science (181 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (135 papers) specifically the topics of International Relations and Foreign Policy (208 papers), Nuclear Issues and Defense (188 papers) and European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies (140 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Comparative Strategy are C. Dale Walton, Colin S. Gray, John Arquilla, David Ronfeldt, Stephen Blank, Keith B. Payne, Sören Scholvin, Mikael Wigell, Michael Clarke and Kristian Åtland.

In The Last Decade

Comparative Strategy

529 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Fields of papers published in Comparative Strategy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Comparative Strategy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Comparative Strategy.

Countries where authors publish in Comparative Strategy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Comparative Strategy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Comparative Strategy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comparative Strategy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026