Strategic Analysis

1.3k papers and 3.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Strategic Analysis in the last decades have received a total of 3.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Strategic Analysis usually cover Political Science and International Relations (848 papers), Sociology and Political Science (399 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (220 papers) specifically the topics of Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (330 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (246 papers) and International Relations and Foreign Policy (228 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Strategic Analysis are Arild Moe, Uttam K. Sinha, Michael Clarke, Nihar R. Nayak, Alok Bansal, Alexander Lukin, Samuel Oyewole, Arvind Gupta, Farah Naaz and Rohan D’Souza.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Strategic Analysis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Strategic Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Strategic Analysis.

Countries where authors publish in Strategic Analysis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Strategic Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Strategic Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Strategic Analysis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025