Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Haidt
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Haidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Haidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Haidt more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Haidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Haidt. The network helps show where Jonathan Haidt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Haidt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Haidt.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Haidt based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Haidt. Jonathan Haidt is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Haidt, Jonathan. (2016). When and why nationalism beats globalism. 32(3). 46.33 indexed citations
4.
Gable, Shelly L. & Jonathan Haidt. (2015). Qué es (y por qué) la psicología positiva. 3–9.3 indexed citations
5.
Haidt, Jonathan, et al.. (2015). The Moral Narratives of Economists. Econ journal watch. 12(1). 49–57.11 indexed citations
6.
Duarte, José L., Jarret T. Crawford, Charlotta Stern, et al.. (2014). Political diversity will improve social psychological science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 38. e130–e130.296 indexed citations breakdown →
Algoe, Sara B. & Jonathan Haidt. (2009). Witnessing excellence in action: the ‘other-praising’ emotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 4(2). 105–127.786 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Haidt, Jonathan & Fredrik Björklund. (2008). Social intuitionists answer six questions about morality. SSRN Electronic Journal.66 indexed citations
14.
Algoe, Sara B., Jonathan Haidt, & Shelly L. Gable. (2008). Beyond reciprocity: Gratitude and relationships in everyday life.. Emotion. 8(3). 425–429.543 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Haidt, Jonathan & Selin Kesebir. (2007). In the Forest of Value: Why Moral Intuitions are Different from Other Kinds. SSRN Electronic Journal.8 indexed citations
16.
Haidt, Jonathan. (2006). The happiness hypothesis: Finding modern truth in ancient wisdom.. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).362 indexed citations
17.
Keltner, Dacher & Jonathan Haidt. (2003). Approaching awe as moral aesthetic and spiritual emotions. Cognition & Emotion. 17.1 indexed citations
18.
Keltner, Dacher & Jonathan Haidt. (2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition & Emotion. 17(2). 297–314.1192 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Haidt, Jonathan. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.. Psychological Review. 108(4). 814–834.4647 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Haidt, Jonathan & Dacher Keltner. (1999). Culture and emotion: Multiple methods find new faces and a gradient of recognition. Cognition & Emotion. 13.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.