Clinical and Translational Allergy

1.1k papers and 12.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Clinical and Translational Allergy in the last decades have received a total of 12.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical and Translational Allergy usually cover Immunology and Allergy (697 papers), Physiology (489 papers) and Dermatology (291 papers) specifically the topics of Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (512 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (486 papers) and Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research (441 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical and Translational Allergy are Joyce I. Boye, Pascal Demoly, Wytske J. Fokkens, Heleen D. de Koning, Jean Bousquet, Marcus Maurer, Karl‐Christian Bergmann, Peter W. Hellings, Claus Bachert and Margitta Worm.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical and Translational Allergy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical and Translational Allergy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical and Translational Allergy.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical and Translational Allergy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical and Translational Allergy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical and Translational Allergy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical and Translational Allergy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025