Child Abuse Review

1.4k papers and 15.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Child Abuse Review in the last decades have received a total of 15.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Child Abuse Review usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.0k papers), Sociology and Political Science (471 papers) and Safety Research (342 papers) specifically the topics of Child Abuse and Trauma (924 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (314 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (290 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Child Abuse Review are Rosaleen McElvaney, Lenneke R. A. Alink, Marije Stoltenborgh, Marian J. Bakermans‐Kranenburg, Marinus H. van IJzendoorn, Michael Flood, Peter Sidebotham, Jo Aldridge, Emma Katz and Kevin D. Browne.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Child Abuse Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Child Abuse Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Child Abuse Review.

Countries where authors publish in Child Abuse Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Child Abuse Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Child Abuse Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Child Abuse Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025