Clinical Nephrology

2.8k papers and 32.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.8k papers published in Clinical Nephrology in the last decades have received a total of 32.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Nephrology usually cover Nephrology (1.4k papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (702 papers) and Surgery (408 papers) specifically the topics of Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (540 papers), Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (462 papers) and Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (278 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Nephrology are Saraladevi Naicker, William F. Finn, Mark A. Perazella, Evangelia Kouidi, Catherine M. Shanahan, Mark Haas, Takashi Shigematsu, Rajeev Raghavan, Gerald B. Appel and Kevin C. Abbott.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Nephrology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Nephrology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Nephrology.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Nephrology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Nephrology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Nephrology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Nephrology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025