ChemBioEng Reviews

332 papers and 8.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 332 papers published in ChemBioEng Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 8.0k indexed citations. Papers published in ChemBioEng Reviews usually cover Biomedical Engineering (133 papers), Mechanical Engineering (94 papers) and Materials Chemistry (63 papers) specifically the topics of Biodiesel Production and Applications (27 papers), Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies (26 papers) and Enzyme Immobilization Techniques (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ChemBioEng Reviews are Morteza Asghari, Amir Dashti, Mashallah Rezakazemi, Ahmad Azari, Meisam Ansarpour, Arezoo Azimi, Michael L. Bender, Pravin Raj Solomon, Baskar Thangaraj and Abas Mohsenzadeh.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in ChemBioEng Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ChemBioEng Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ChemBioEng Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in ChemBioEng Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ChemBioEng Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ChemBioEng Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ChemBioEng Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025