Catalysis Surveys from Asia

492 papers and 12.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 492 papers published in Catalysis Surveys from Asia in the last decades have received a total of 12.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Catalysis Surveys from Asia usually cover Materials Chemistry (343 papers), Catalysis (182 papers) and Mechanical Engineering (148 papers) specifically the topics of Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (229 papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (127 papers) and Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies (117 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Catalysis Surveys from Asia are Noboru Yamazoe, Akihiko Kudo, Masahiro Sugiura, Jae Sung Lee, Wonyong Choi, Benjaram M. Reddy, Ganapati D. Yadav, Ataullah Khan, Adesoji A. Adesina and Kannan Srinivasan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Catalysis Surveys from Asia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Catalysis Surveys from Asia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Catalysis Surveys from Asia.

Countries where authors publish in Catalysis Surveys from Asia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Catalysis Surveys from Asia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Catalysis Surveys from Asia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catalysis Surveys from Asia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025