Regulation & Governance

759 papers and 16.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 759 papers published in Regulation & Governance in the last decades have received a total of 16.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Regulation & Governance usually cover Strategy and Management (453 papers), Political Science and International Relations (190 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (185 papers) specifically the topics of Regulation and Compliance Studies (320 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (125 papers) and Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (115 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Regulation & Governance are Julia Black, Benjamin Cashore, Steven Bernstein, Karen Yeung, Tanja A. Börzel, Lars H. Gulbrandsen, Jonathan Zeitlin, Genia Kostka, Martino Maggetti and Thomas Risse.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Regulation & Governance

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Regulation & Governance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Regulation & Governance.

Countries where authors publish in Regulation & Governance

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Regulation & Governance. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Regulation & Governance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Regulation & Governance more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025