Calíope
- Literature and Literary Theory
- History
- Molecular Biology
- Religious studies top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Fields
- Literature and Literary Theory (210 papers)Religious studies (55 papers)General Arts and Humanities (10 papers)
- Topics
- Early Modern Spanish LiteratureSpanish Literature and Culture StudiesEarly Modern Women Writers
In The Last Decade
Calíope
151 papers receiving 372 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Literature and Literary Theory 278
- History 123
- Molecular Biology 107
- Religious studies 83
- Sociology and Political Science 62
Countries where authors publish in Calíope
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Calíope. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Calíope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Calíope more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Calíope
This network shows the impact of papers published in Calíope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Calíope.
About Calíope
The 296 papers published in Calíope in the last decades have received a total of 548 indexed citations . Papers published in Calíope usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (210 papers), Religious studies (55 papers) and General Arts and Humanities (10 papers) specifically the topics of Early Modern Spanish Literature (174 papers), Spanish Literature and Culture Studies (95 papers) and Early Modern Women Writers (47 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Calíope are Anne J. Cruz, H. Tom Soh, James P. Chambers, Seung Soo Oh, David A. Wacks, Michael Eisenstein, Jamey D. Marth, Minseon Cho, Jeff Nie and Mercedes Blanco.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.