Revista Caatinga

1.3k papers and 6.8k indexed citations

About

The 1.3k papers published in Revista Caatinga in the last decades have received a total of 6.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Revista Caatinga usually cover Plant Science (1.0k papers), Soil Science (387 papers) and Agronomy and Crop Science (161 papers) specifically the topics of Growth and nutrition in plants (539 papers), Soil Management and Crop Yield (293 papers) and Banana Cultivation and Research (150 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Revista Caatinga are Hans Raj Gheyi, Geovani Soares de Lima, Lauriane Almeida dos Anjos Soares, Aurélio Paes Barros Júnior, Arthur Bernardes Cecílio Filho, Thieres George Freire da Silva, Salvador Barros Torres, Francisco Bezerra Neto, Jailma Suerda Silva de Lima and Pedro Dantas Fernandes.

In The Last Decade

Revista Caatinga

1.2k papers receiving 6.5k citations

Fields of papers published in Revista Caatinga

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Revista Caatinga. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Revista Caatinga.

Countries where authors publish in Revista Caatinga

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Revista Caatinga. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Revista Caatinga with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revista Caatinga more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026