British Journal of Psychotherapy

1.1k papers and 4.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in British Journal of Psychotherapy in the last decades have received a total of 4.3k indexed citations. Papers published in British Journal of Psychotherapy usually cover Clinical Psychology (864 papers), Philosophy (191 papers) and Social Psychology (160 papers) specifically the topics of Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (715 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (218 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (154 papers). The most active scholars publishing in British Journal of Psychotherapy are Esther Bick, Jeremy Holmes, Norman D. Macaskill, Allan N. Schore, Joy Schaverien, Paul Hoggett, Rosemary Rizq, Catherine E. Freeman, R. D. Hinshelwood and Paul Gordon.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in British Journal of Psychotherapy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in British Journal of Psychotherapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in British Journal of Psychotherapy.

Countries where authors publish in British Journal of Psychotherapy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in British Journal of Psychotherapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in British Journal of Psychotherapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites British Journal of Psychotherapy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025