Briefings in Functional Genomics

About

The 682 papers published in Briefings in Functional Genomics in the last decades have received a total of 17.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Briefings in Functional Genomics usually cover Molecular Biology (539 papers), Genetics (122 papers) and Cancer Research (107 papers) specifically the topics of RNA modifications and cancer (95 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (90 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (81 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Briefings in Functional Genomics are Mark Blaxter, John W. Davey, Hiroyoshi Iwata, Jean‐Luc Jannink, Aaron J. Lorenz, David Roy Smith, Quan Zou, Mukesh Jain, Todd P. Michael and Andrew P. Hutchins.

In The Last Decade

Briefings in Functional Genomics

652 papers receiving 17.3k citations

Fields of papers published in Briefings in Functional Genomics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Briefings in Functional Genomics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Briefings in Functional Genomics.

Countries where authors publish in Briefings in Functional Genomics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Briefings in Functional Genomics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Briefings in Functional Genomics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Briefings in Functional Genomics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026