Brain Communications

1.5k papers and 12.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Brain Communications in the last decades have received a total of 12.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Brain Communications usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (507 papers), Neurology (428 papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (324 papers) specifically the topics of Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (244 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (206 papers) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (177 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Brain Communications are Jianfeng Feng, Edmund T. Rolls, Wei Cheng, Karen Ritchie, Tam Watermeyer, Dennis Chan, John Hardy, Valentina Escott‐Price, Raj N. Kalaria and Yoshiki Hase.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Brain Communications

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Brain Communications. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Brain Communications.

Countries where authors publish in Brain Communications

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Brain Communications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Brain Communications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brain Communications more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025