Countries where authors publish in Korean Circulation Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Korean Circulation Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Korean Circulation Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Korean Circulation Journal more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Korean Circulation Journal
This network shows the impact of papers published in Korean Circulation Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Korean Circulation Journal.
About Korean Circulation Journal
The 1.9k papers published in Korean Circulation Journal in the last decades have received a total of 16.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Korean Circulation Journal usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.3k papers), Internal Medicine (78 papers) and Surgery (782 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (296 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (287 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (208 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (202 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (187 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (178 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (177 papers) and Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (151 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Korean Circulation Journal are Young Mi Hong, Eue‐Keun Choi, Hyeon Chang Kim, Myeong‐Chan Cho, Boyoung Joung, Moo‐Yong Rhee, Youngkeun Ahn, Sungha Park, Yangsoo Jang and Gi Beom Kim.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.