BMJ Open Respiratory Research

910 papers and 10.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 910 papers published in BMJ Open Respiratory Research in the last decades have received a total of 10.5k indexed citations. Papers published in BMJ Open Respiratory Research usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (663 papers), Physiology (274 papers) and Epidemiology (152 papers) specifically the topics of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (301 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (170 papers) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (167 papers). The most active scholars publishing in BMJ Open Respiratory Research are Nicholas S Hopkinson, Ritankar Das, Christopher W. Barton, Mitchell D. Feldman, David Shimabukuro, Samson Mataraso, Alyn H. Morice, Jeffrey J. Swigris, Jeffrey P. Kanne and Pierre Kory.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in BMJ Open Respiratory Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in BMJ Open Respiratory Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in BMJ Open Respiratory Research.

Countries where authors publish in BMJ Open Respiratory Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in BMJ Open Respiratory Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in BMJ Open Respiratory Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BMJ Open Respiratory Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025