BMJ Open Ophthalmology

562 papers and 4.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 562 papers published in BMJ Open Ophthalmology in the last decades have received a total of 4.4k indexed citations. Papers published in BMJ Open Ophthalmology usually cover Ophthalmology (427 papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (299 papers) and Epidemiology (96 papers) specifically the topics of Retinal Diseases and Treatments (201 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (171 papers) and Retinal Imaging and Analysis (137 papers). The most active scholars publishing in BMJ Open Ophthalmology are James S. Wolffsohn, Amy L. Sheppard, Benjamin Connell, Jack X. Kane, Vito Romano, Fangyao Tang, Carol Y. Cheung, Clement C. Tham, Alvin L. Young and Stephen B. Kaye.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in BMJ Open Ophthalmology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in BMJ Open Ophthalmology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in BMJ Open Ophthalmology.

Countries where authors publish in BMJ Open Ophthalmology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in BMJ Open Ophthalmology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in BMJ Open Ophthalmology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BMJ Open Ophthalmology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025