Julia Shonfield

612 total citations · 1 hit paper
17 papers, 453 citations indexed

About

Julia Shonfield is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Developmental Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Julia Shonfield has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 453 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Ecology, 7 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 4 papers in Developmental Biology. Recurrent topics in Julia Shonfield's work include Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (6 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (4 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers). Julia Shonfield is often cited by papers focused on Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (6 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (4 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers). Julia Shonfield collaborates with scholars based in Canada and United States. Julia Shonfield's co-authors include Erin M. Bayne, Andrew G. McAdam, Murray M. Humphries, Stan Boutin, Ryan W. Taylor, Ronald J. Brooks, Jamieson C. Gorrell, David W. Coltman, David R. Wilson and Scott E. Nielsen and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecology, Animal Behaviour and Forest Ecology and Management.

In The Last Decade

Julia Shonfield

16 papers receiving 440 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Autonomous recording units in avian ecological research: current use and future applications

2017 258 citations Julia Shonfield, Erin M. Bayne Avian Conservation and Ecology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Julia Shonfield Canada	9	368	251	114	87	48	17	453
Michał Budka Poland	14	280 0.8×	324 1.3×	245 2.1×	31 0.4×	24 0.5×	43	424
Samuel R. P.‐J. Ross Japan	10	184 0.5×	153 0.6×	93 0.8×	57 0.7×	38 0.8×	17	348
Adrián Barrero Spain	10	224 0.6×	114 0.5×	59 0.5×	76 0.9×	7 0.1×	29	272
Juan Sebastián Ulloa Colombia	10	138 0.4×	188 0.7×	71 0.6×	29 0.3×	61 1.3×	18	264
Richard Hedley Canada	11	161 0.4×	205 0.8×	101 0.9×	43 0.5×	54 1.1×	26	282
Benjamin L. Gottesman United States	9	179 0.5×	186 0.7×	59 0.5×	16 0.2×	37 0.8×	13	289
Carlos Barros de Araújo Brazil	10	169 0.5×	104 0.4×	116 1.0×	121 1.4×	7 0.1×	27	302
Gregory S. Kaltenecker United States	11	437 1.2×	165 0.7×	106 0.9×	60 0.7×	5 0.1×	25	478
Darren P. O’Connell Ireland	9	124 0.3×	69 0.3×	48 0.4×	40 0.5×	18 0.4×	23	228

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Shonfield

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Shonfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Shonfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Shonfield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Shonfield

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Shonfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Shonfield. The network helps show where Julia Shonfield may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia Shonfield

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia Shonfield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia Shonfield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia Shonfield. Julia Shonfield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

MacPherson, Maggie, Kevin R. Burgio, Benjamin G. Freeman, et al.. (2025). An introduction to predictive distribution modelling for conservation to encourage novel perspectives. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation. e0001–e0001.

Knight, Elly C., et al.. (2023). Audio data compression affects acoustic indices and reduces detections of birds by human listening and automated recognisers. Bioacoustics. 33(1). 74–90. 4 indexed citations

Shonfield, Julia & Erin M. Bayne. (2023). Weak support for cumulative effects of industrial disturbance on three owl species in Alberta’s boreal forest. Avian Conservation and Ecology. 18(1). 1 indexed citations

Hannah, Kevin C., et al.. (2022). Fire severity and pre-fire forest composition affect Northern Hawk Owl presence in burned forests in western North America. Forest Ecology and Management. 528. 120632–120632. 5 indexed citations

Shonfield, Julia, et al.. (2021). Quantifying Vocal Activity and Detection Probability to Inform Survey Methods for Barred Owls (Strix varia). Journal of Raptor Research. 55(1). 4 indexed citations

Shonfield, Julia & Erin M. Bayne. (2019). Effects of industrial disturbance on abundance and activity of small mammals. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 97(11). 1013–1020. 9 indexed citations

Shonfield, Julia, et al.. (2019). Spatial distribution of the Boreal Owl and Northern Saw-whet Owl in the Boreal region of Alberta, Canada. Avian Conservation and Ecology. 14(2). 8 indexed citations

Shonfield, Julia. (2018). Using Bioacoustics to Examine the Effects of Industrial Disturbance on Owls and their Prey. Ecology. 1 indexed citations

Shonfield, Julia, et al.. (2018). Utility of Automated Species Recognition For Acoustic Monitoring of Owls. Journal of Raptor Research. 52(1). 42–42. 36 indexed citations

10.

Shonfield, Julia & Erin M. Bayne. (2017). The effect of industrial noise on owl occupancy in the boreal forest at multiple spatial scales. Avian Conservation and Ecology. 12(2). 25 indexed citations

11.

Shonfield, Julia & Erin M. Bayne. (2017). Autonomous recording units in avian ecological research: current use and future applications. Avian Conservation and Ecology. 12(1). 258 indexed citations breakdown →

12.

Shonfield, Julia, Jamieson C. Gorrell, David W. Coltman, et al.. (2016). Using playback of territorial calls to investigate mechanisms of kin discrimination in red squirrels. Behavioral Ecology. 28(2). 382–390. 5 indexed citations

13.

Wilson, David R., Stan Boutin, Murray M. Humphries, et al.. (2015). Red squirrels use territorial vocalizations for kin discrimination. Animal Behaviour. 107. 79–85. 24 indexed citations

14.

Shonfield, Julia, et al.. (2013). Reducing accidental shrew mortality associated with small-mammal livetrapping I: an inter- and intrastudy analysis. Journal of Mammalogy. 94(4). 745–753. 20 indexed citations

15.

Shonfield, Julia, et al.. (2013). Reducing accidental shrew mortality associated with small-mammal livetrapping II: a field experiment with bait supplementation. Journal of Mammalogy. 94(4). 754–760. 21 indexed citations

16.

Humphries, Murray M., Julia Shonfield, Stan Boutin, Andrew G. McAdam, & Ryan W. Taylor. (2012). Territorial defence behaviour in red squirrels is influenced by local density. Behaviour. 149(3-4). 369–390. 28 indexed citations

17.

Shonfield, Julia. (2011). The effect of familiarity on vigilance behaviour in grey squirrels. 6(1). 45–49. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact