Australian family physician

245 papers and 1.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 245 papers published in Australian family physician in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Australian family physician usually cover General Health Professions (70 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (46 papers) and Surgery (27 papers) specifically the topics of Primary Care and Health Outcomes (35 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (17 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (11 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Australian family physician are Pam McGrath, Barry J. Marshall, Karin Ried, Susan Wearne, John B. Dixon, Björn Stenström, Claire Jackson, Dawn E. DeWitt, Simon Bridge and Leon Piterman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Australian family physician

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Australian family physician. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Australian family physician.

Countries where authors publish in Australian family physician

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Australian family physician. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Australian family physician with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australian family physician more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025