Countries where authors publish in Electronic News
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Electronic News. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Electronic News with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Electronic News more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Electronic News. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Electronic News.
About Electronic News
The 247 papers published in Electronic News in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Electronic News usually cover Communication (170 papers), Gender Studies (37 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (38 papers) specifically the topics of Media Studies and Communication (144 papers), Social Media and Politics (105 papers), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (48 papers), Media Influence and Health (33 papers), Media Influence and Politics (21 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (20 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (18 papers) and Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (17 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Electronic News are Cory L. Armstrong, C. A. Tuggle, Gwendelyn S. Nisbett, Young-Ju Kim, J. Brian Houston, Glenn J. Hansen, Andrew C. Billings, Lynn Owens, Karen McIntyre and Chance York.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.