Administrative Theory & Praxis

852 papers and 7.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 852 papers published in Administrative Theory & Praxis in the last decades have received a total of 7.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Administrative Theory & Praxis usually cover Sociology and Political Science (371 papers), Public Administration (236 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (229 papers) specifically the topics of Public Policy and Administration Research (216 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (122 papers) and Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (61 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Administrative Theory & Praxis are Eva Sørensen, Matthew T. Witt, Michael W. Spicer, Camilla Stivers, Staci M. Zavattaro, Alexander Kouzmin, David John Farmer, Lilliard E. Richardson, Stuart C. Gilman and Hugh T. Miller.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Administrative Theory & Praxis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Administrative Theory & Praxis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Administrative Theory & Praxis.

Countries where authors publish in Administrative Theory & Praxis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Administrative Theory & Praxis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Administrative Theory & Praxis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Administrative Theory & Praxis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025