Citations per year, relative to Michael W. Spicer Michael W. Spicer (= 1×)
peers
Craig A. Olson
Countries citing papers authored by Michael W. Spicer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael W. Spicer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael W. Spicer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael W. Spicer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael W. Spicer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael W. Spicer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael W. Spicer. The network helps show where Michael W. Spicer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael W. Spicer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael W. Spicer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael W. Spicer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael W. Spicer. Michael W. Spicer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Spicer, Michael W.. (2014). Justice, Conflict, and Adversary Argument: An Examination of Stuart Hampshire's Ideas and Their Implications for American Public Administration. EngagedScholarship @ Cleveland State University (Cleveland State University). 38(4). 445–465.1 indexed citations
Spicer, Michael W.. (2004). AALIVENET: An agent based distributed interactive composition environment.. The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association. 2004.7 indexed citations
6.
Spicer, Michael W.. (2004). A Note on Origins: Hegel, Weber, and Frederician Prussia.. Administrative Theory & Praxis. 26(1).6 indexed citations
7.
Spicer, Michael W., et al.. (2003). The Learning Agent Based Interactive Performance System. The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association. 2003.3 indexed citations
Spicer, Michael W.. (2003). Masks of Freedom: An Examination of Isaiah Berlins' Ideas on Freedom and their Implications for Public Administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis. 25.4 indexed citations
10.
Spicer, Michael W.. (2003). Some Reflections on the "Prosecutorial State". Administrative Theory & Praxis. 25(1).1 indexed citations
11.
Spicer, Michael W.. (1998). Public Administration under Enlightened Despotism in Prussia: An Examination of Frederick the Great's Administrative Practice. EngagedScholarship @ Cleveland State University (Cleveland State University).1 indexed citations
12.
Spicer, Michael W., et al.. (1997). Political Science and Public Administration: A Necessary Cleft?. Public Administration Review. 57.3 indexed citations
13.
Spicer, Michael W. & Larry D. Terry. (1996). Administrative Interpretation of Statutes. Public Administration Review. 56(1).
Spicer, Michael W.. (1975). New Approaches to the Problem of Tax Evasion. EngagedScholarship @ Cleveland State University (Cleveland State University).12 indexed citations
19.
Spicer, Michael W.. (1974). A behavioral model of income tax evasion. OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network).25 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.