Asia-Pacific population journal

378 papers and 3.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 378 papers published in Asia-Pacific population journal in the last decades have received a total of 3.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Asia-Pacific population journal usually cover Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (143 papers), Sociology and Political Science (122 papers) and Gender Studies (101 papers) specifically the topics of Global Maternal and Child Health (141 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (95 papers) and Migration and Labor Dynamics (47 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asia-Pacific population journal are Ronald Skeldon, Karen Oppenheim Mason, John Knodel, Bhakta B. Gubhaju, Abdullahel Hadi, Shyam Thapa, Baochang Gu, Angelique Chan, Krishna Chandra Roy and Rob Stephenson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Asia-Pacific population journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asia-Pacific population journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asia-Pacific population journal.

Countries where authors publish in Asia-Pacific population journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asia-Pacific population journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asia-Pacific population journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asia-Pacific population journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025