China An International Journal

625 papers and 2.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 625 papers published in China An International Journal in the last decades have received a total of 2.8k indexed citations. Papers published in China An International Journal usually cover Political Science and International Relations (290 papers), Sociology and Political Science (230 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (81 papers) specifically the topics of China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (182 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (68 papers) and Chinese history and philosophy (64 papers). The most active scholars publishing in China An International Journal are Kjeld Erik Brødsgaard, Maria Edin, Andrew G. Walder, Johan Lagerkvist, John Wong, Hongying Wang, Jeremy Youde, Yanrui Wu, Guo Peng and Dingding Chen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in China An International Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in China An International Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in China An International Journal.

Countries where authors publish in China An International Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in China An International Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in China An International Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites China An International Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025