Countries where authors publish in Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Current Chinese Affairs. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Current Chinese Affairs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Current Chinese Affairs more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Current Chinese Affairs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Current Chinese Affairs.
About Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
The 384 papers published in Journal of Current Chinese Affairs in the last decades have received a total of 3.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Current Chinese Affairs usually cover Development (55 papers), Political Science and International Relations (218 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (247 papers) specifically the topics of China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (144 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (90 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (62 papers), International Development and Aid (55 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (33 papers), China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations (28 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (27 papers) and China's Global Influence and Migration (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Current Chinese Affairs are Rongbin Han, Rhys Jenkins, Günter Schubert, Lucy Corkin, Gordon Mathews, Ana Cristina Alves, Hilary du Cros, Heike Holbig, Anna L. Ahlers and Jeremy Garlick.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.