This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Arts & Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Arts & Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arts & Health more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Arts & Health. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Arts & Health.
About Arts & Health
The 340 papers published in Arts & Health in the last decades have received a total of 4.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Arts & Health usually cover Conservation (193 papers), Music (33 papers) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (11 papers) specifically the topics of Art Therapy and Mental Health (193 papers), Music Therapy and Health (138 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (69 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (53 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (31 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (26 papers), Diversity and Impact of Dance (24 papers) and Neuroscience and Music Perception (22 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Arts & Health are Paul M. Camic, Fatima Al Sayah, Kimberly D. Fraser, Helen J. Chatterjee, Gene D. Cohen, Linda Thomson, Bridget Lockyer, Stephen Clift, Theodore Stickley and Sara Houston.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.