Argumentation

1.0k papers and 7.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Argumentation in the last decades have received a total of 7.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Argumentation usually cover Philosophy (355 papers), Artificial Intelligence (281 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (226 papers) specifically the topics of Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (238 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (180 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (126 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Argumentation are Douglas Walton, Frans H. van Eemeren, Scott Jacobs, J. Anthony Blair, Michael A. Gilbert, Fabrizio Macagno, Ralph H. Johnson, Rob Grootendorst, Erik C. W. Krabbe and Jens E. Kjeldsen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Argumentation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Argumentation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Argumentation.

Countries where authors publish in Argumentation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Argumentation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Argumentation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Argumentation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025