Arbitration International

701 papers and 1.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 701 papers published in Arbitration International in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Arbitration International usually cover Strategy and Management (637 papers), Political Science and International Relations (377 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (171 papers) specifically the topics of International Arbitration and Investment Law (621 papers), Dispute Resolution and Class Actions (246 papers) and Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (239 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Arbitration International are Emmanuel Gaillard, T.W. Wälde, Klaus Peter Berger, James Crawford, Pierre Mayer, Charles N. Brower, William W. Park, Zachary Douglas, Jan Paulsson and Luke Nottage.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Arbitration International

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Arbitration International. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Arbitration International.

Countries where authors publish in Arbitration International

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Arbitration International. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Arbitration International with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arbitration International more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025