Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management451
Law273
Economics and Econometrics159
The Journal of World Investment & TradeUnited Kingdom
Journal of International ArbitrationUnited Kingdom
Journal of Law and Sustainable DevelopmentIndonesia
University of Pennsylvania journal of international economic lawUnited States
ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law JournalUnited States
European Business Law ReviewUnited Kingdom
Business and Professional Ethics JournalUnited States
Netherlands International Law ReviewNetherlands
Current Legal ProblemsUnited Kingdom
Northwestern journal of international law & businessUnited States
The Journal of World Investment & TradeUnited KingdomView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Arbitration International
Arbitration International · 1×
×1.01.1kSM
×0.9687PSIR
×1.0435OBHRM
×0.5136LAW
×1.7263EE
Citations per year, relative to Arbitration International
Arbitration International · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Arbitration International
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Arbitration International. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Arbitration International with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arbitration International more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Arbitration International
This network shows the impact of papers published in Arbitration International. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Arbitration International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.