Hans Van Houtte
- Political Science and International Relations
- Strategy and Management
- Law top 10%
- Accounting
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Filip de LyJohan Erauw
- Topics
- International Arbitration and Investment Law (7 papers)Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (6 papers)European and International Law Studies (4 papers)
- Journals
- The American Journal of Comparative LawInternational and Comparative Law QuarterlyICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Hans Van Houtte
14 papers receiving 41 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 18
- Political Science and International Relations 34
- Strategy and Management 17
- Law 12
- Accounting 9
- Sociology and Political Science 8
Countries citing papers authored by Hans Van Houtte
This map shows the geographic impact of Hans Van Houtte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans Van Houtte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans Van Houtte more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hans Van Houtte
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans Van Houtte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans Van Houtte. The network helps show where Hans Van Houtte may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hans Van Houtte
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hans Van Houtte. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hans Van Houtte based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hans Van Houtte. Hans Van Houtte is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | The law of international trade (2nd ed.) | 1 |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | The law of cross-border securities transactions | 4 |
| 12 | Het Weens Koopverdrag | 1 |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | Legal issues in international trade | 7 |
| 17 | International Law and Community Treaty-Making Power | 1 |
About Hans Van Houtte
Hans Van Houtte is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Political Science and International Relations and Law, having authored 17 papers that have together received 55 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Arbitration and Investment Law (7 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (6 papers) and European and International Law Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (34 citations), Law (12 citations) and Strategy and Management (17 citations). Hans Van Houtte has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Filip de Ly and Johan Erauw. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Comparative Law, International and Comparative Law Quarterly and ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.