Journal of physiotherapy

635 papers and 18.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 635 papers published in Journal of physiotherapy in the last decades have received a total of 18.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of physiotherapy usually cover Pharmacology (157 papers), Surgery (125 papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (113 papers) specifically the topics of Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (151 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (78 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (77 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of physiotherapy are James H. McAuley, Aidan G Cashin, Michele Sterling, Lisa A. Harvey, Tarcisio F. de Campos, Nicholas F. Taylor, Joanna Diong, Li Khim Kwah, Nora Shields and Louise Ada.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of physiotherapy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of physiotherapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of physiotherapy.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of physiotherapy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of physiotherapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of physiotherapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of physiotherapy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025