Annual Review of Genetics

1.5k papers and 221.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Annual Review of Genetics in the last decades have received a total of 221.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Annual Review of Genetics usually cover Molecular Biology (847 papers), Genetics (370 papers) and Plant Science (284 papers) specifically the topics of Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (136 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (129 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (122 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annual Review of Genetics are S Lindquist, Douglas C. Wallace, Joseph Felsenstein, E A Craig, Keith R. Yamamoto, Nancy Kleckner, Congcong He, Daniel J. Klionsky, Mark Hochstrasser and Martin Rosenberg.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annual Review of Genetics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annual Review of Genetics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annual Review of Genetics.

Countries where authors publish in Annual Review of Genetics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annual Review of Genetics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annual Review of Genetics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annual Review of Genetics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025