Birth Defects Research

1.0k papers and 11.0k indexed citations

About

The 1.0k papers published in Birth Defects Research in the last decades have received a total of 11.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Birth Defects Research usually cover Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (379 papers), Surgery (227 papers) and Molecular Biology (174 papers) specifically the topics of Folate and B Vitamins Research (120 papers), Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (114 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (106 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Birth Defects Research are Nils Bergman, Linda S. Franck, Karel O’Brien, John M. Rogers, Philip J. Lupo, Russell S. Kirby, Mark A. Canfield, Asher Ornoy, Vijaya Kancherla and Robert E. Meyer.

In The Last Decade

Birth Defects Research

894 papers receiving 10.0k citations

Countries where authors publish in Birth Defects Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Birth Defects Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Birth Defects Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Birth Defects Research more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Birth Defects Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Birth Defects Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Birth Defects Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026