Annals of Carnegie Museum

767 papers and 8.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 767 papers published in Annals of Carnegie Museum in the last decades have received a total of 8.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Annals of Carnegie Museum usually cover Paleontology (364 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (300 papers) and Ecology (292 papers) specifically the topics of Evolution and Paleontology Studies (263 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (132 papers) and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (105 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annals of Carnegie Museum are John R. Wible, David S. Berman, William W. Korth, Bradley C. Livezey, Leonard Krishtalka, Richard Lund, Rodney M. Feldmann, Mary R. Dawson, Hugh H. Genoways and Richard K. Stucky.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annals of Carnegie Museum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annals of Carnegie Museum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annals of Carnegie Museum.

Countries where authors publish in Annals of Carnegie Museum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annals of Carnegie Museum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annals of Carnegie Museum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annals of Carnegie Museum more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025