This map shows the geographic impact of research published in AICCM Bulletin. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in AICCM Bulletin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites AICCM Bulletin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in AICCM Bulletin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in AICCM Bulletin.
About AICCM Bulletin
The 208 papers published in AICCM Bulletin in the last decades have received a total of 633 indexed citations . Papers published in AICCM Bulletin usually cover Conservation (93 papers), Museology (38 papers), Archeology (102 papers), Space and Planetary Science (12 papers) and Earth-Surface Processes (28 papers) specifically the topics of Conservation Techniques and Studies (91 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (49 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (47 papers), Museums and Cultural Heritage (32 papers), Building materials and conservation (28 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (12 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (12 papers) and Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (10 papers). The most active scholars publishing in AICCM Bulletin are Ian D. MacLeod, Robyn Sloggett, Mark Gilberg, Robert L. Feller, Jaap J. Boon, Tom Learner, Katrien Keune, Bronwyn Ormsby, John Drennan and Janet Hughes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.