Éilish Duke

1.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
13 papers, 699 citations indexed

About

Éilish Duke is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Éilish Duke has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 699 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Éilish Duke's work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers). Éilish Duke is often cited by papers focused on Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers). Éilish Duke collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and China. Éilish Duke's co-authors include Christian Montag, Alexander Markowetz, Rayna Sariyska, Bernd Lachmann, Andrew Cooper, Luke D. Smillie, Cornelia Sindermann, Alan D. Pickering, Martin Reuter and Martin Reuter and has published in prestigious journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Frontiers in Psychology and Psychoneuroendocrinology.

In The Last Decade

Éilish Duke

13 papers receiving 683 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Smartphone addiction, daily interruptions and self-reported productivity

2017 329 citations Éilish Duke, Christian Montag Addictive Behaviors Reports profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Éilish Duke United Kingdom	11	445	161	148	128	122	13	699
Filip Nuyens United Kingdom	12	515 1.2×	199 1.2×	173 1.2×	118 0.9×	99 0.8×	20	696
Jory Deleuze Belgium	11	594 1.3×	237 1.5×	252 1.7×	114 0.9×	132 1.1×	16	728
Winneke A. van der Schuur Netherlands	9	363 0.8×	206 1.3×	116 0.8×	109 0.9×	52 0.4×	10	546
Cemal Onur Noyan Türkiye	9	500 1.1×	228 1.4×	208 1.4×	83 0.6×	81 0.7×	35	735
Georgina A. Tolan Australia	14	361 0.8×	139 0.9×	98 0.7×	145 1.1×	73 0.6×	20	852
Cecilia Giordano Italy	12	389 0.9×	165 1.0×	270 1.8×	142 1.1×	127 1.0×	44	685
Elfrid Krossbakken Norway	7	578 1.3×	264 1.6×	227 1.5×	109 0.9×	111 0.9×	8	751
Lauren L. Saling Australia	10	464 1.0×	190 1.2×	133 0.9×	68 0.5×	52 0.4×	27	715
Jin-Young Kim South Korea	10	528 1.2×	172 1.1×	137 0.9×	83 0.6×	129 1.1×	26	697
Serdar Nurmedov Türkiye	8	489 1.1×	222 1.4×	176 1.2×	72 0.6×	73 0.6×	15	638

Countries citing papers authored by Éilish Duke

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Éilish Duke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Éilish Duke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Éilish Duke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Éilish Duke

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Éilish Duke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Éilish Duke. The network helps show where Éilish Duke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Éilish Duke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Éilish Duke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Éilish Duke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Éilish Duke. Éilish Duke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

Kola, Susanna, et al.. (2025). The complex landscape of vaccine hesitancy and hesitant adopters: Quantitative predictors and thematic insights into COVID-19 vaccine attitudes. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. 21(1). 2511350–2511350. 1 indexed citations

Sindermann, Cornelia, Éilish Duke, & Christian Montag. (2020). Personality associations with Facebook use and tendencies towards Facebook Use Disorder. Addictive Behaviors Reports. 11. 100264–100264. 30 indexed citations

Duke, Éilish, et al.. (2020). The Role of Personality, Political Attitudes and Socio-Demographic Characteristics in Explaining Individual Differences in Fear of Coronavirus: A Comparison Over Time and Across Countries. Frontiers in Psychology. 11. 552305–552305. 43 indexed citations

Plieger, Thomas, et al.. (2020). Predicting Stock Market Performance. Journal of Individual Differences. 42(2). 64–73. 6 indexed citations

Lachmann, Bernd, Éilish Duke, Rayna Sariyska, & Christian Montag. (2017). Who’s addicted to the smartphone and/or the Internet?. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. 8(3). 182–189. 55 indexed citations

Duke, Éilish & Christian Montag. (2017). Smartphone addiction, daily interruptions and self-reported productivity. Addictive Behaviors Reports. 6. 90–95. 329 indexed citations breakdown →

Plieger, Thomas, et al.. (2017). The role of genetic variation in the glucocorticoid receptor (NR3C1) and mineralocorticoid receptor (NR3C2) in the association between cortisol response and cognition under acute stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 87. 173–180. 30 indexed citations

Duke, Éilish, et al.. (2017). Cortical alpha asymmetry at central and posterior – but not anterior – sites is associated with individual differences in behavioural loss aversion. Personality and Individual Differences. 121. 206–212. 14 indexed citations

Montag, Christian, Éilish Duke, & Alexander Markowetz. (2016). Toward Psychoinformatics: Computer Science Meets Psychology. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. 2016. 1–10. 59 indexed citations

10.

Sindermann, Cornelia, Mei Li, Rayna Sariyska, et al.. (2016). The 2D:4D-Ratio and Neuroticism Revisited: Empirical Evidence from Germany and China. Frontiers in Psychology. 7. 811–811. 21 indexed citations

11.

Montag, Christian, Christopher Kannen, Bernd Lachmann, et al.. (2015). The importance of analogue zeitgebers to reduce digital addictive tendencies in the 21st century. Addictive Behaviors Reports. 2. 23–27. 35 indexed citations

12.

Montag, Christian, Éilish Duke, Peng Sha, et al.. (2015). Does acceptance of power distance influence propensities for problematicInternet use? Evidence from a cross‐cultural study. Asia-Pacific Psychiatry. 8(4). 296–301. 15 indexed citations

13.

Cooper, Andrew, Éilish Duke, Alan D. Pickering, & Luke D. Smillie. (2014). Individual differences in reward prediction error: contrasting relations between feedback-related negativity and trait measures of reward sensitivity, impulsivity and extraversion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 8. 248–248. 61 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact