Acta Scientiarum. Technology

1.0k papers and 4.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.0k papers published in Acta Scientiarum. Technology in the last decades have received a total of 4.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Acta Scientiarum. Technology usually cover Food Science (145 papers), Plant Science (131 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (110 papers) specifically the topics of Agricultural and Food Sciences (55 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (36 papers) and Biofuel production and bioconversion (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta Scientiarum. Technology are Asım Balbay, Mehmet Esen, Jesuí Vergílio Visentainer, Rosângela Bergamasco, Affonso Celso Gonçalves, Gabriel Constantino Blain, Binod Chandra Tripathy, Talat Körpınar, Erlon Lopes Pereira and Makoto Matsushita.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Acta Scientiarum. Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta Scientiarum. Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta Scientiarum. Technology.

Countries where authors publish in Acta Scientiarum. Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta Scientiarum. Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta Scientiarum. Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta Scientiarum. Technology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025