Acta Scientiarum Agronomy

1.6k papers and 13.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Acta Scientiarum Agronomy in the last decades have received a total of 13.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Acta Scientiarum Agronomy usually cover Plant Science (1.3k papers), Soil Science (464 papers) and Molecular Biology (216 papers) specifically the topics of Growth and nutrition in plants (589 papers), Soil Management and Crop Yield (380 papers) and Banana Cultivation and Research (181 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta Scientiarum Agronomy are Cosme Damião Cruz, Carlos Alberto Scapim, Gabriel Constantino Blain, Antônio Teixeira do Amaral Júnior, Orivaldo Arf, Alessandro Lucca Braccini, Rafael Pio, Morel de Passos e Carvalho, Osvaldo Resende and Salatiér Buzetti.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Acta Scientiarum Agronomy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta Scientiarum Agronomy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta Scientiarum Agronomy.

Countries where authors publish in Acta Scientiarum Agronomy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta Scientiarum Agronomy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta Scientiarum Agronomy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta Scientiarum Agronomy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025