Countries where authors publish in Acta Polymerica
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta Polymerica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta Polymerica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta Polymerica more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta Polymerica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta Polymerica.
About Acta Polymerica
The 2.5k papers published in Acta Polymerica in the last decades have received a total of 25.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Acta Polymerica usually cover Polymers and Plastics (960 papers), Biomaterials (461 papers), Organic Chemistry (903 papers), General Materials Science (81 papers) and Process Chemistry and Technology (65 papers) specifically the topics of Synthesis and properties of polymers (407 papers), Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (365 papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (344 papers), Polymer crystallization and properties (297 papers), Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties (179 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (178 papers), Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry (144 papers) and Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry (140 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta Polymerica are Manfred Hartmann, Holger Frey, Matthias Hartmann, Dirk Hölter, Florian Müller‐Plathe, José L. Segura, Klaus Schmidt‐Rohr, Armin Burgath, G. Hinrichsen and Brigitte Voit.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.