Acta Botanica Hungarica

587 papers and 3.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 587 papers published in Acta Botanica Hungarica in the last decades have received a total of 3.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Acta Botanica Hungarica usually cover Plant Science (444 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (348 papers) and Food Science (90 papers) specifically the topics of Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (200 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (150 papers) and Bryophyte Studies and Records (103 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta Botanica Hungarica are A. Borhidi, Tamás Pócs, S. Y. Kondratyuk, Edit Farkas, Zoltán Botta‐Dukát, László Lőkös, Zsolt Molnár, Ferenc Horváth, Jae‐Seoun Hur and János Bölöni.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Acta Botanica Hungarica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta Botanica Hungarica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta Botanica Hungarica.

Countries where authors publish in Acta Botanica Hungarica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta Botanica Hungarica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta Botanica Hungarica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta Botanica Hungarica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025